Women In China Essays (433 words) - Chinese Women, Women In China

Women In China By Confucian theory, the woman is inferior to nearly everyone. She is to do as her husband wishes and in return receives little more than a pat on the back and is told Good job. Women's feet were bound as children, even though it caused severe problems later in life, because it was a sign of nobility. Through out China's history, women have been looked down upon by everyone. Even today, women are not equal to men in the home or work place. Are conditions under which women are treated getting better over time? It doesn't seem that people in China are treating women better than they were two hundred years ago. Women are unfairly laid off by employers in times of economic restructuring and are very often denied rights that have been passed by Legislation. There are many studies regarding unemployment in China. Conservative estimates are that between twenty-five to thirty million people are with out work in China. The staggering statistic is that nearly seventy-five percent of laid off workers were women. This is very illegal. Labor laws in China forbid disproportionate layoffs, but big business doesn't listen. These examples are just a few of many and only pertain to urban women. Women in rural areas are said to be even less equal than urban women. Mostly because of the wide spread poverty in the rural areas of China. Women are not offered the same schooling or job opportunities as men are in these areas. Government programs aimed at helping control poverty are failing quickly because of lack of funding. Studies show that in 1987, between one hundred and fifty and two hundred million women lived in areas designated as poor. This is a frightening number. Why should so many women live in poverty because of the arrogance of employers, so what if she's a girl? China's poor treatment of women isn't getting better. While the government tries to cover it up with false statistics and mislabeling of unemployed women, people are suffering. This doesn't only hurt the women of China, but the innovators of the future. There might be a girl sitting in her one room house in the most rural area in the country with better ideas the most recognized scientist in Hong Kong. The government has at least some power to do something about this major problem but doesn't. Why that is, the world may never know. Bibliography Human Rights in China Employment Threats to Women's Economic Independence http://www.hrichina.org/crf/english/99spring/e15_employment.htm Human Rights in China Rural Women: Less Equal than Urban Women http://www.hrichina.org/crf/english/99spring/e17_rural.htm Governmental Issues

Essay on Cash for Keys

Essay on Cash for Keys Essay on Cash for Keys Everyone wins in the Cash for Keys program (Troeh, 2009). The Cash for Keys program gives homeowners who are struggling to make their mortgage payments the opportunity to receive a lump sum of cash in exchange for vacating their properties by an agreed upon date with the lender. The homeowner agrees to leave the property in move in condition so that the lender may quickly take back the property and lost it for sale. The homeowner is released from all responsibility of the property and the bank saves thousands of dollars in legal fees. Cash for Keys was created to aid both homeowners and lenders in the mortgage crisis. The mortgage crisis is the result of an insufficiently regulated market (Brock, 2008). Low lending standards were a significant component of the mortgage crisis (Brock, 2008). Lenders made millions of loans to people to buy homes that they could not afford (Brock, 2008). It is estimated that these lending practices have cost lenders tens of billions of dollars (B rock, 2008). The inflationary housing boom meant that people who could not afford their homes were able to refinance or sell (Brock, 2008). Homeownership was a goal that former president George Bush encouraged to citizens by stating â€Å"We want everybody in America to own their own home† (Brock, 2008). An earlier policy to help homeowners was the Making Home Affordable Program. This program was President Obama’s administration’s strategy to help homeowners avoid foreclosure while stabilizing the country’s housing market and improving the nation’s economy (MakingHomeAffordable.gov). This program was implemented on April 1, 2009 and its objective was to lower monthly mortgage payments (MakingHomeAffordable.gov). The program required that the lender who originated the loan must refinance the loan (MakingHomeAffordable.gov). Not all homeowners were eligible for this program. A Short Sale was another program which aimed to help struggling hom eowners with mortgages they could no longer afford. Short sales were a timely process which involved the listing of the property for sale (Elias). Potential buyers could offer a price for the property which was often significantly less than what the homeowner owed to the lender (Elias). A short sale was an attempt to avoid foreclosure or bankruptcy for the homeowner (Elias). Lenders could sue the homeowner for the difference between the loan and the selling price of the property (Elias). There was a tax consequence to short sales – lenders reported the difference to the Internal Revenue Service as taxable income and homeowners were required to pay income tax (Elias). This new problem led to the creation of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 which changed how the difference was reported to the Internal Revenue Service (Elias). Short sales have tripled since 2008 to an estimated annual volume of 400.000 based on a data sample of single family residence short sale transactions (Dymi, 2010). Over half of all short sale transactions have been in four states hardest hit by the mortgage crisis: California, Florida, Texas and Arizona (Dymi, 2010). The Cash for Keys program offered hope for those who struggled with attempts to modify loans, list properties as short sales or dealt with harassing collections procedures (Harmon, 2011). The Cash for Keys program offered a bail out to the Homeowner instead of the banks (Harmon, 2011). It offered the homeowner the option to walk away from the home (Elias). The Cash for Keys program offers homeowners cash as an incentive to leave their homes in a timely manner (Brathwaite, 2011). The homeowner agrees to maintain the property and leave it in broom swept condition and also agrees to removing debris from the interior of the home as well as from the exterior (California Department of Real Estate). The homeowner also agrees to leaving all light fixtures, appliances and landscaping intact (California Department of

Should Abusive Parents Be Punished or Treated Research Paper

Should Abusive Parents Be Punished or Treated - Research Paper Example Parenting has usually been treated as a private issue in the United States, and the government has been hesitant to meddle with the rights of parents to care for or raise their children in their own way. Even though a number of laws have been implemented since the 1960s forbidding extreme parental cruelty against children, there is still, in reality, tremendous lenience for violence against children (Westman, 2007). These aggressive actions may not be viewed as abusive by some but are regarded as abuse by many professionals. Many states do not forbid parents from hitting their children. Yet, most states have laws that identify child abuse. The federal government has ratified the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) which establishes rules that the states should integrate into their child abuse laws (Wallace & Roberson, 2010). CAPTA mandates the designation of child abuse to add (Hirschy, Thompson, & Wilkinson, 2010, 2): â€Å"Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, or exploitation, or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of serious harm†. In a research on cases of absence of supervision, many involved parents who entrusted their children to an incompetent guardian or caregiver or parents who totally abandoned their children. In 40% of the cases examined, dependable parents admitted: â€Å"they believed there was nothing wrong with what had happened† (Collins, 2006, 808). Moreover, the caseworkers who were instructed to evaluate the case documents thoroughly reported â€Å"that in more than half the cases†¦ the supervision problem was due to a lack of knowledge or poor judgment about the abilities or needs of children of a given age†.  Ã‚